Why Destructive Testing Validates Everything
Generic simulation tools can't account for FDM's layer-by-layer construction and anisotropic behavior. That's why we didn't just run simulations—we pushed real parts to failure under real loads. The results? Simulation predictions matched actual performance, proving that toolpath-based simulation works for safety-critical applications.
What You'll Get:
- Load Case 1 (700kg target): Watch as an optimized part supports 695kg - with simulation predicting 856kg capacity and exact failure location
- Load Case 2 (300kg target): See the weakest possible loading scenario tested at 200kg, 280kg, and failure at 300kg - matching the 285kg simulation prediction
- Failure Location Validation: Visual proof that simulation accurately predicted not just the load limit, but exactly where the part would fail
- The Secret Advantage: How GrabCAD Print toolpath data enables simulation accuracy that generic FEA tools cannot match
- Access to technical resources and early access pilot program information
Upon submission, resources about our early access program.
